About Me

My photo
I am a Practitioner of 'The 7e Way of Leaders' where a Leader will Envision, Enable (ASK for TOP D), Empower, Execute, Energize, and Evolve grounded on ETHICS!

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Daily Lessons from Life 26 September 2009

"Croatia backs down on smoking ban - Cafe and restaurant owners told the government that the ban was ruining their businesses. -Sat, Sep 26, 2009 AFP

ZAGREB - Croatia has made a U-turn on a law banning smoking in public after buckling to pressure from cafe and restaurant owners who told the government it was ruining their businesses.


The parliament on Thursday adopted an amended law that again allows smoking in cafes and restaurants in specially designated smoking zones covering no more than a fifth of any premises. The remaining four-fifths must be kept for non-smokers.

Cafes smaller than 50 square metres (538 square feet), however, will be allowed to decide whether to become a smoking or non-smoking establishment after meeting certain criteria.


Ever since the law banning smoking in all public places was introduced in May, managers of cafes and restaurants have pressed the government to amend it.

Zlatko Puntijar, head of the National Association of Bar and Restaurant Owners, hailed the move which followed talks between his group and the Ministry of Health. "The recession already took its toll and the winter would have been a disaster," for the sector, Puntijar told AFP. "During summer cafes and restaurants had terraces that saved them."

Officials have said the law was aimed at protecting non-smokers, who make up 68 percent of the country's population of 4.4 million.


In Croatia, tobacco is blamed for killing some 10,000 people each year while an additional 3,000 die from passive smoking, according to the health ministry. Annual health costs in treating the consequences of smoking are estimated at 422 million euros (619 million dollars).

The population remains split, however, regarding recent developments.


"I'm glad because, regardless of health, there was no income. Smokers are better consumers," said one man named Josip who runs the modest Ceker cafe in downtown Zagreb.

"Ceker will be for smokers," Josip said estimating that since the ban was introduced his income had dropped by 30 percent. He believed it would have been more if he had not had some tables in front of the cafe.


"Cigarettes are not good but everyone should have to right to decide for himself," said cafe regular Predrag Kovac, lighting a cigarette.

But not all cafe owners have been opposed to the initial ban.


"After some grumbling, people who have the habit of going out would have continued to do so," said Visnja Barjaktarevic who runs the upmarket Argentina Cafe in Zagreb.

"If it can work abroad why it could not work in Croatia?" Morena Tolj, sipping her coffee outside the cafe, echoed her view. "It's a shame that they ceded to pressure. Smoking ban works perfectly well in other countries like in France and Italy."


But some smokers were grateful for the change in policy.

"It was a real torture while the worst was in nightclubs," claims Vanda Mrsic, a designer, who smokes two packs a day. "Being a heavy smoker, I preferred to stay at home than to go out and abstain."


The Balkans are home to Europe's most inveterate smokers, with 30 to 40 percent of all adults hooked on a habit, which is considered a major cause of premature death, according to the World Health Organisation."

A news worthy report for sure. Business revenue over health. Well said by that lady: If it can work elsewhere why can't it work here?'

Lessons for me are:

1. 68% is not the majority in Croatia! Money talk!;

2. habits are NEVER easy to change. Especially the bad ones. Leaders who have the steel to do it would have persisted. May be there are special considerations not revealed in the press. May be there is a need for more consultation or to show how many suffered irreparable health damages from smoking and 2nd-hand smoke?;

3. this country has a lot of world class athletes. Not sure how this mentality developed? 'My choice to smoke' is definitely to be respected but what about those non-smokers?

May the authority revisit this for the sake of the majority non-smokers!

No comments: